Smart Girls Don't Need Help From the Government

Wednesday, the Senate failed to pass (along party lines) the gender marginalizing, government growing, free enterprise violating, “Paycheck Fairness Act.”

The liberal spin on this result has been that there is gender inequality in this country, and the “big, bad, lady-hating” Republicans are preventing women from making the same as men in a time of economic recovery.

There are a couple problems with this logic, beginning with the fact that Republicans, men and women alike, don’t disagree that gender inequality wrongly exists in the workplace. However, the government shouldn’t act as a mechanism to tell private employers how to run their businesses. If a woman or man is being paid disproportionately to staff of the opposite gender, but presents a better or equal quality of work, they should be able to find another job that will pay them the salary they desire. That’s how the free market works.

Furthermore, the “Paycheck Fairness Act” is an effort to achieve income parity specifically for women. But gender discrimination based on pay is not exclusively applicable to women. Men also experience gender inequality for one, in the modeling industry.

Not only that, but depending on the industry one gender may generally be more equipped with the skills needed to complete the necessary requirements than another. It is for the industry and employers to decide based on productivity. And, keeping with the theme of individual responsibility it is also the employee’s responsibility to know what they should be earning, accomplish the job at hand, and negotiate with their employer.

“Smart girls” know all Americans are entitled to make the same wage, and that to prevent one’s pursuit of life, liberty or pursuit of happiness based on gender is wrong. But we also know we don’t need the government to control the private market in order to do so.

A “smart girl” knows that based on merit, and our own “smarts” we can make our own way without Uncle Sam holding our hand along the way.

Do you like this post?

Showing 3 reactions


Brandi Henneman- Wielgopolski commented 2012-09-09 20:47:01 -0400 · Flag
I wrote a blog about this on my sgp page. Two laws already exist that make it illegal to discriminate pay based on gender and the laws are explicitly clear. Further, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 helps enforce the law because it gives women recourse, the EEOC. The Ledbetter Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act are not necessary pieces of legislation at all as it is already illegal to discriminate. Unlike the Pay Act of 63 and Title VII which are very cut and dry, these new pieces of legislation are jam packed with political pay offs. If the womens groups really cared about the pay discrepancy, they would quit spending money on studies and start promoting the EEOC.
Laura Fanelli commented 2012-06-13 16:22:02 -0400 · Flag
This bill had nothing to do with pay equity. Obama, Pelosi, Schumer and other Dems are on record paying their female staffers as much as 40% below their male staffers so they are talking out of both sides of their mouths as usual. This bill allowed trial lawyers to run roughshod over employers forcing them to reveal confidential salary information and other confidential employee information with no proof by the person alleging pay discrimination. It is anti-business and none of the government’s business how employers operate or what they pay employees. It is between the employee and the employer.
Alyssa Bonk published this page in Home 2012-06-08 10:39:09 -0400