Blog

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

SGP: UNIFIED THEORY OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS


Most Americans feel something has changed, and not for the better, in America. But ask them what exactly has changed and how the change

occurred, and most can only give a general impression of a loss of liberty and expansion of government power and control.

It is this writer’s belief that his Unified Theory of American Government and Politics will help his fellow American understand what is changing, how it is being changed and how they can resist change they oppose. Now this writer has collected enough information to write a book, but in deference to constructive and less constructive feedback about the length of some of his articles, this article will be a summary of this theory. (And I will write the book in the future). The Importance of getting this information into the minds of the American masses outweigh any personal economic considerations.

This writer politely suggests the reader will get more out of this article if they read these 2 previous articles first:


To understand foundation of American Government, it is necessary
to how our current American Government came to be. We will look at
aspects of the government that preceded our Republic and examine and
compare those same aspects as they occurred in the early Republic. We
will compare these aspects of Governance under:

  1. Divine Right of Kings – Pre-American Revolution
  2. Consent of the Governed – Early America
  3. Progressivism – Current Day America


For our purposes, we are going to go back to the fall of the Roman Empire 476 AD.
In Western Europe, following the fall of Rome an economic system know
as Feudalism and a Governance Doctrine Known as the Divine Right of
Kings evolved into being.


DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS


The Governance Doctrine of Divine Right of Kings stated essentially:
The King is a God or the representative of God here on earth, and, therefore no earthly being can question his decisions.


NO RIGHTS


All property belonged to the King. People upon the Kings property
were subjects as opposed to citizens. Subjects do not have rights; they
obtain permissions and/or privileges from the King or the Kings
representative.


NO PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS


None besides the King owned property; they obtained the King’s
permission to be upon it and/or were granted the privilege of managing a
particular piece of property for the King in exchange for loyalty,
payments and soldiers for the King’s Army. In short, almost the entire
wealth of the country belonged to the King.


SUBJECTS


The vast majority of people were peasants. Under the economic system
of Manorial Feudalism peasants were essentially tied to a parcel of
land. In effect, they were the property of the King and whomsoever the
King appointed to manage that land.


CLASS SYSTEM


Various Class systems existed. The sharpest division was the King
and his subjects. But to control all of his lands and subjects, the
King had to delegate authority to others to administer sections of his
Kingdoms. From this arose an aristocracy; initially just the trusted
Administrators of the King’s Property and/or governmental affairs.

Though they did not think of it like this at the time, Aristocrats
essentially traded the liberty of the masses for their own personal
gain. Even if the King was wrong, they most usually went along to get
along to keep their privileges and permissions. Little or no thought
was given to the quality of life of the lower classes. And any conflicts
of conscience between the King and the peasants were quickly decided in
the favor of the King. Perhaps the key thought to take from this
paragraph is that the King cannot maintain control without the support
of the lower hierarchy. The King and the aristocracy were mutually
dependent on each other to maintain their power and privilege and
enforce their will on the masses.

As the Governance Doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings matured,
another class of persons emerged called “Freedmen” or “Freemen” These
often were merchants or tradesmen with enough wealth to be able to
support and free themselves.


SELF DETERMINATION


There was little or no Self-Determination. An individual’s life was
most predicted by the class or status they were born into. Life was so
harsh and existence so close to the margins, that most could not afford
the consequences of challenging the social order. Your profession was
most likely to be that of your father. If you were born the son of a
blacksmith, more than likely you would grow up to be a blacksmith. If
you were born the daughter of a blacksmith, you father would likely
arrange a marriage with for you with someone of similar class and
status. There were exceptions, to be sure, but the upward mobility
experienced in the first 225 years of the American Republic did not
exist under Feudalism and the Divine Right of Kings.

Without Self-Determination, the day to day, month to month and year
to year elements of living became settled tradition. And tradition and
superstition became the reasons and restraints to those that dare dream
of their life being something more.


ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUTH


Truth was established by the King and the Church. The truth the King
and the Church established could not be challenged. From your history
you remember persons being excommunicated, punished, burned at the
stake, or otherwise being killed for challenging Church Doctrine.
People were killed for....

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/UuIarnOHk9

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact
your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of
repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the
local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if
this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still
likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training
junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same
“livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our
#Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money
for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time
without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of
our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.

3 reactions Share

TIM ROWLAND SHOULD JUST STOP WRITING ABOUT POLITICS

     Hit and Run Rowland (HR2) has struck again in a column entitled "Republican male politicians, just stop talking about women", attacking the Party of which he falsely claims to belong (in the full sense of the word belong). I call him HR2 because he writes mostly negative inflammatory pieces about Conservative individuals and the Republican Party, then he hides refusing to answer comments or engage in a discussion.  He rarely writes about issues, writing only about what has already been sensationalized in the Liberal mainstream media. His column is like reading a political version of The National Enquirer where issues are avoided and personal attacks are encouraged. He really should stick to writing about farm animals.
    Today he blathered about the Republican Party's misunderstanding of women and their alleged War on Women. He offers three "proofs" of Republican misogyny, which are the most over-used attempts of the media to try to inflame the public against Conservatives.

1.  Birth control (Republicans think women are sluts)
2.  Legitimate rape (one goofy politician)
3.  Christianity and the concept of  "submission to one's husband"


"I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.”
Rush Limbaugh
   

     The first issue that was left out of Rowland's article is birth control and who pays for it, and most recently who must supply it against their religious beliefs. Like the saying goes, "I still don't know how someone's reproductive system can simultaneously be 0% my business but 100% my financial responsibility." Many taxpayers object to paying for other's birth control.  Most recently, based on their religious beliefs, a group of nuns and the Catholic Church fought against Obamacare's mandate for them to supply birth control to their employees. This is  a very reasonable argument. Most mainstream religions would consider an unmarried woman fighting for birth control as wrong or promiscuous behavior. Did Rush go too far by stating that the young woman who was fighting for free birth control "must be a slut"? Yes...and guess what?...he apologized.

[crickets chirping]
Dave Letterman, Bill Maher, et al

    Now here is the hypocrisy of the Left that Rowland also left out of his article: Liberals have publicly called  Sarah Palin and her daughter sluts without apology and even refused to condemn those that did. Palin has also been called a c@#t. She has been deemed deserving of having men deficate into her mouth. Her special needs child was said not to be hers, not to be her husbands, and called a retard. Hustler did a porn movie about her called, "Who's Nailin' Paylin?" and Eminem rapped about sex with Palin in "We Made You." Where was the outrage from the Left? Why doesn't Rowland write about it?

We should not judge all Muslims by the actions of a few terrorists. It is OK to judge the Republican Party by one ignoramus who happens to be a Republican.
   
    The second issue that was left out of Rowland's article is abortion and whether it is morally acceptable in cases of rape. One ignorant Republican stated that if it was a legitimate [actual] rape that no pregnancy would result. This is clearly one misinformed, misguided, and ignorant individual who happens to be a Republican. I don't know him. I know many, many Republicans, and I can state without reservation that I have never met one who would agree with that statement, nor do I. Yet, this one statement by one individual is used shamelessly in an attempt to prove that Republicans hate women. It was a valid question about an issue that has been debated for decades. I might add that statistics show that less than 1% of abortions are due to rape or incest. Rowland thought it would be cool to use this one statement to flippantly sully "his peeps" the Republicans. This is called a legitimate writing skill?
   
This is one of the most misrepresented tenants of the Christian faith used to divide Americans and further an agenda.

     The third issue that was left out of Rowland's article is the Christian precept that "wives should submit to their husbands." This is also a Jewish and a Muslim precept. Of course all three major religions have devotees that range from modern to orthodox. It is disingenuous to attach this thought only to fundamentalist Christian Republicans. This is one of the most misrepresented tenants of the Christian faith used to divide Americans and further an agenda. Those who use it always intentionally leave out the part where husbands are to lay down their lives for their wives like Christ did for the church. In other words it is a two-way street of giving and preferring one another over one's self. Liberals make it sound like Christian Republicans actually believe in wife rape, battery, slavery, abuse, forced pregnancy, with no choice of a career or the pursuit of happiness. Are you kidding me? Do you know the fabulous, intelligent, educated, gifted, motivated, and successful Republican/Conservative women that I know? The only ones that I know that treat Conservative women that way are Liberals! Again, this was used by Rowland in an attempt to cleverly brand all  men on the Right as Neanderthals.
   Here again is the hypocrisy of the Left, also not mentioned in Rowland's article.  Liberals have shown that they cannot conceive of the notion of submitting to anyone in a decision-making process. I certainly have seen that. However, they don't mind at all forcing their wives to submit to public humiliation.  She is made to face the public with a smile when her Liberal politician husband publicly announces that their marriage has been a complete sham (only after getting caught) and that he is actually gay... or when her Liberal politician husband gets caught getting BJs in the Oval Office...or when her Liberal politician husband gets caught twice sexting with other women...or when her Liberal politician husband has been caught in an affair that resulted in a love child, even while she--the wife--is dying of cancer. They were all forced to submit to degrading themselves in public for the cause of Liberal politics.


The real acts of war against women...


1. Ted Kennedy, one of the heroes of the Left,  was driving drunk and drove off of a bridge on Chappaquiddick Island where his car was submerged in water. He saved himself, leaving his passenger  Mary Jo Kopechne to drown.  He was married with 3 children, which is probably why he did not report the accident and that Kopechne was in the car for almost 10 hours! His constant selfish behavior humiliated his wife to the point that she drank herself into alcoholism in order to cope.

2. Bill Clinton, the rock star of the Left, took advantage of a 21-year old female intern. He was the most powerful man in the world at the time and at least 20 years her senior. It was revealed that he used her to get oral sex in the oval office. He then demonized the young girl and her girlfriend who had the audacity to expose his behavior. Talk about sexual harassment on the job! There are about a dozen women who made allegations of his aggressive sexual behavior over many years beginning when he was the governor of Arkansas. Each time the woman was threatened by his cronies, ruined publicly, or silenced in some way. He lied about Monica Lewinsky and when he knew he couldn't get away with it any longer he ruined her life making her the laughing stock of the country. All of this while his wife was forced to stand by him publicly.

3. The Left promotes abortion at any time in a woman's pregnancy, performed in any place (doesn't have to be a hospital), by anyone (does not need to be an M.D.) without allowing them to see a sonogram or receive counseling about how they will deal with this act for the rest of their lives. This is considered a kindness towards women?

4. The Left claims to support women yet they set out to destroy and dismiss any successful woman who happens to be a Conservative. If they can't prove her to be an adulteress or a enticer of men, they attack her intelligence and characterize her as an idiot. So-called women's groups do not ever rise to defend them.

   Did Tim Rowland write anything of substance in this piece about Republicans? The article was just full of silly frill and fluff with no facts and no depth of opinion. Will he respond to comments?  Never.
   The Herald Mail should allow the local TEA Party to have a column where issues would be debated and discussed openly and intelligently. They cancelled Mail Call in an attempt to improve the image of the city. The next obvious step is to cancel Rowland and/or provide a new column written by a local who is not afraid to take comments and discuss and defend what they write.

I am a liberated Conservative woman! Come on Ol' Hit and Run Rowland...bring it on!!

2 reactions Share

SGP: SHERIFF OF NOTTINGHAM VS FIAT MONEY


So much talk lately about the increasing disparity in wealth. And,once again, this writer is going to turn your perspective of reality on

its head. Today we will show you one of the many ways your government and ruling class steal value from labor, without labor even noticing. This is the true source of the growing wealth disparity.

  • “All wealth is created by Labor” – John Locke
  • “All value is created by Labor” – Don Mashak


Even land and gold have no value unless and until labor is applied to it. Gold has no value until dug out of the ground and Land has no value until labor is used to hunt a deer, harvest crops, dig an oil well or build a house, etc.

  • “The value created only by labor is as much the property as gold and land is” – Don Mashak
  • “Government has no other end, but preservation of property” - John Locke

SHERIFF OF NOTTINGHAM


In days of old, governments and/or the ruling class had to physically
collect taxes, etc from the masses. A means to finesse taking property
from the masses without them noticing the taking had not yet been
invented. This writer has selected Sheriff of Nottingham to represent
the Tax Collector as he is well known to all from the various stories of
Robinhood.

In reality, low level tax collectors collected the majority of the
taxes and called upon the Sheriff to only collect from those who could
not or would not pay the tax. Upon being informed, the Sheriff of
Nottingham would then engage in a series of escalating interactions
designed to induce payment and/or seize property of the person owing the
tax.

But there was a drawback to this practice. To state the obvious,
when the Sheriff of Nottingham seized someone’s coins, wheat, corn,
chickens, goat or Ox, etc, people noticed. The physicality of these tax
collection actions raised angst and fomented rebellion amongst the
masses.
And after a few uprisings and rebellions, someone thought: “There
must be a better, less obvious way to take money from the masses.”


FIAT MONEY


First it must be remembered that the concept of money was invented
and became popular because it simplified transactions between persons.
For example, instead of bringing your cow with you to trade for wood at
the Lumber Yard; it was much easier to bring money. Further, the parties
did not have to haggle how many boards a particular cow was worth. With
a standard form of money, over time the free market established the
fair market value of almost every commodity in terms of the unit of
money. And finally, the
Lumber Yard owner was not left with a cow that
had to be fed and cared for.

Fiat money is money that is not back by specie, such as gold and
silver. In other words, for each dollar the government prints it is
required to purchase a dollar’s worth of specie and keep it in the
government vault.


THE BENEVOLENT GOVERNMENT AND NON-FIAT MONEY


In the first year of money under a benevolent government, (for the
sole purpose of simplifying economic transactions between persons (and
making tax collection easier) the government would create an amount of
money equal to the value of the products the country produced. In this
benevolent government, the money is NOT fiat money; it is backed by
gold.

For our example, we are going to have a very simple economy. The only
things people produce are cows and jumpsuits. The only thing that
people need to live are cows to eat and jumpsuits to wear. For our
example, Cows are consumed and jumpsuits wear out in one year, but money
never wears out and is never lost.

In the year before the government implements “money”, the barter rate
is 2 jumpsuits to exchange for 1 cow. Taxes to the government are half a
cow or 1 jumpsuit for each adult citizen.

In year 1, the country produces 100 new cows and 100 new jumpsuits.
To facilitate the use of money instead of barter, the government puts a
total of $300 into circulation. Based on last year’s barter exchange
rate, the fair market value of each cow should be 2 dollars and that of
jumpsuits should be 1 dollar. Taxes for each adult is 1 dollar.

In year 2, the country produces the same number of 100 cows and 100
jumpsuits, so there is no need for the government to add more money to
the economy. The price of each cow and jumpsuits remain unchanged
In year 3, the country produces 110 new cows and 110 new jumpsuits.
To keep prices stable, the government puts 30 more new dollars to the
economy. (As in our example, money never wears out and is never lost;
the amount of money in circulation is 330 dollars.) The price of cows
remains 2 dollars and jumpsuits remains at 1 dollar. Taxes to the
government remain 1 dollar.
Ad infinitum…

While our example over simplifies the US Monetary system, all of the
other elements that actually exist only cloud the net effect that will
be demonstrated. Even when added into the mix, these other elements do
not substantially offset the negative effect which is about to be
exposed. Neither does expanding the range of products produced or
consumed does not negate the detrimental effect about to be exposed.


THE MALEVOLENT GOVERNMENT AND FIAT MONEY


Our malevolent government is identical to the benevolent government
example, except that it uses fiat money and will print more of it. Our
malevolent government using Fiat Money means that instead of buying more
gold to back additional money the government prints, it only has to buy
more ink and paper.

The year before year 1 with “money” is the same as year 1 under the
benevolent government: the barter rate is 2 jumpsuits to exchange for 1
cow. Taxes for the government are half a cow or 1 jumpsuit for each
adult citizen.

Year 1 of “money” under the malevolent government is also the same as
year 1 of “money” with the benevolent government. The country produces
100 new cows and 100 new jumpsuits. To facilitate the use of money
instead of barter, the government puts a total of $300 into circulation.
Based on last year’s barter exchange rate, the fair market value of
each cow should be 2 dollars and that of jumpsuits should be 1 dollar.
Taxes for each adult is 1 dollar.

In year 2, the malevolent malignancy reveals....

To continue reading for free, click here http://t.co/U4YrK7Ih7n

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact
your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of
repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the
local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if
this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still
likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training
junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same
“livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our
#Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money
for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time
without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of
our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.

3 reactions Share

SGP: Married? The Judicial Assault on your Unalienable, Natural Law Rights


Though this article focuses on the departures from the Rule of Law in the Divorce case of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki vs. David Rucki, this

writer takes a broader perspective. That broader being one addressing the importance of enforcing adherence to the the Rule of Law and Due Process; both of which are not only statutory requirements but Constitutional and Natural Law Rights of every person. (Before we go farther, this writer asserts that he would write the same article if theroles of the parties were reversed.) This article is a follow up to the latest hearing relating to this matter from January 10, 2014 and a call to action for the upcoming January 27, 2014 hearing for Lawyer Michelle
MacDonald.

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Martin Luther King Jr.,

[The next round in this battle against injustice occurs, Monday, January 27, 2014 at 9 AM Dakota County District Court, 1560 Highway 55, Hastings, MN. State of
Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota, Court file no. 19HA-CR-13-2934]


Let us begin with an intellectual and emotional appetizer
intended to make you non-lawyer types hungry for the rest of the story.

Imagine finding yourself in this scenario, you and your
spouse have been married nearly 20 years. You have built a successful
business and have five children. To settle the Divorce, you agree to
take the family home of 14 years and have custody of your 5 children
while letting your spouse have parenting time, the business, and other
properties.


Somewhere along the line your spouse sits you and the 5
children down at the table with a gun and says either “you are going to
kill everyone” or “you are only going to kill yourself”.
More than a year after the divorce is settled, you find
out about a hearing that you were not party to. With no evidentiary
hearing or finding of fact, Sheriffs inform you must be out of the house
and cannot tell the children why. You drop the children off at school
and go home and pack only the one bag that the Sheriff’s deputy will let
you pack. Everything else is lost to you. The children are to be taken
care of by an undisclosed third party. And you leave your home of 14
years.
A year later, during a hearing to restore the divorce
agreement and regain custody of the children, your lawyer is arrested
during the hearing for reasons yet unknown and you are told to leave, as
obviously the hearing will not continue. You take the files and other
property left in the court room so they do not become “lost”. You later
learn that after you left, the Judge resumed the hearing with your lawyer in handcuffs, without glasses, shoes, files or a client….


Later you find that the children are back with your spouse, but two of them have run away and not been seen in months.


That should be enough to get your attention and peak your interest.

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe


With that literary appetizer consumed, this writer hopes that
the reader will find this writer’s perspective unique and thought
provoking enough to be moved to action.

This writer sat in the Federal Court room in St. Paul, MN on January 10, 2014 and heard Judge Susan
Richard Nelson ask Lawyer Michelle McDonald to produce Case Law
Citations from the Federal 8th Circuit Court. As this writer listened,
the following thought began to take root in this writers mind:

  • Can anyone wearing black robes arbitrarily deprive any US citizen of their Unalienable Natural Law Rights?


And with that thought, this writer set about answering
this question using this thought process from one of his favorite
recurring tweets:

  • You know those neat tricks & observations they use to
    catch the bad guys in major media and Hollywood shows? You need to start
    using them on your government.
@DMashak on Twitter (abbreviations & truncations removed)


And so we begin to use those neat tricks and observations to try to make sense of what has transpired and how Federal Judge Susan Richard Nelson should rule. In the case of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki, the facts of interest to this writer are....

To continue reading for free, please click here http://t.co/GHVbMEQ35j

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact
your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of
repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the
local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if
this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still
likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training
junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same
“livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our
#Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money
for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time
without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of
our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice - This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve)
in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not
passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this
author... unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust
and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate
you to the contrary of your perspective.

3 reactions Share